Methodology for the allocation of School Counselling Service
The existing allocation of School Counselling Service to schools has been guided by a state-wide methodology developed in consultation with stakeholders as well as by research. Stakeholders included representatives from the Primary Principals Association, Secondary Principals Council, and PPA SSP reference groups.
The allocation methodology for the School Counselling Service is currently under review. Principals were advised in Term 4 2023 that the current methodology will be maintained during 2024 while the review is undertaken.
The revised allocation methodology will address the changing demands on the service and the demographic profile of schools. The new allocation cycle will incorporate the planned 250 additional School Counselling Service positions.
What principles underpin the methodology?
The methodology for the School Counselling Services:
- is informed by current research, feedback from stakeholders and NSW school and student data
- provides every NSW public school a School Counselling Service allocation that reflects student need.
How is the allocation of School Counselling Service calculated?
The counselling allocation is based on student enrolment data and on indicators of student need.
The existing allocation of School Counselling Service is based on student enrolment data and on indicators of student need. A 60% weighting is provided to enrolments and a 40% weighting is provided to the indicators of need. Students impacted by disability, socio-disadvantage and remoteness are provided 40%, 40% and 20% weightings respectively in the indicators of need.
Factors | Measure |
---|---|
Students impacted by disability | Student Learning Need Index (SLNI) Notional enrolment for each support class including Schools for Specific Purposes (SSPs) |
Socio-disadvantage | Average of proportion of students where both parents are not in paid work, and the proportion of students where the maximum education for both parents is Year 10 (Parent Index) |
Remoteness | Acessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA+) |
How is the indicator of need for students impacted by disability and additional learning and support needs calculated?
The Student Learning Needs Index (SLNI) has been applied as it is a broad measure of disability and additional learning and support needs. Students in Schools for Specific Purposes were allocated a notional SLNI.
How is the socio-disadvantage factor of need calculated?
The Mental Health of Children and Adolescents, Report on the Second Australian Child and Adolescent Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing indicates there is a strong association between mental disorders and specific socio-demographic factors. Children and adolescents with parents and carers with lower levels of education and higher levels of unemployment had higher rates of mental disorders.
A specific index has been calculated by the Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation and applied to reflect this research. This data is collected through the Enrolment Registration Number (ERN) system. This index correlates highly with other measures of disadvantage.
How is the remoteness factor of need calculated?
The remoteness factor measures remoteness using Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA+). ARIA+ is a measure of service accessibility and remoteness derived from road distances between populated localities and service centres. ARIA+ is widely used across Australia and has become recognised as a nationally consistent measure of geographic remoteness.
2024 review of the allocation methodology
Following extensive consultation with key stakeholders, the following methodology for the allocation of School Counselling Service has been approved.
New allocations will commence from the beginning of Term 1, 2026 in line with the establishment of the additional 250 FTE positions as a part of the government’s election commitment increase the School Counselling Service.
The methodology will be:
- The core methodology will have a greater weighting placed on factors of need (60%) than enrolment numbers (40%). The socioeconomic (FOEI) , disability (NCCD) and remoteness (ARIA) factors of need contribute equal weightings of 20% each.
- Minimum enrolment band for large schools will be amended, moving from a minimum of 850 students for a 1.0 FTE to a minimum of 700 students. For schools with enrolments less than 700, allocations will continue to be calculated using the core methodology (as above).
- School Counselling Service allocations for high schools and central schools (with 200+secondary students), will maintain a minimum allocation of 1.0 FTE.
- There will be no changes to the allocation for unique setting schools, such as distance education schools, hospital schools and Intensive English Centres.
- 36 FTE positions will be established across the state to strengthen responses to critical incidents and to meet local needs.
- No school will receive a reduced allocation.